The two arguments by analogies include North Carolina offering microcosm of America鈥檚 modern discontent and how Trump won the presidency with razor-thin margins in swing states. The strong argument is one that relates the unrest in North Carolina to the discontent that is happening in the US. The weak argument is one which shows a win in three states Michigan Matthias Ginter Dortmund Jersey , Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania would mean a win for Hillary Clinton as the president. In North Carolina, anger and unrest have been very common which exposes the issue of race and policing. North Carolina is an important swing state in the US presidential election. The unrest in the swing state is a clear indication of what is happening in the country. As North Carolina is considered as an essential swing state in the country, it shows a representation of the modern discontent in the US. With the events that are happening in North Carolina Mario Gotze Dortmund Jersey , Race and policing can play an essential role in what happens in the election. I consider the argument that North Carolina unrest to be a major indication of discontent in the US, which indicates that the candidate who focus attention on what is happening in the swing state I likely to be the winner in the presidential race. The argument does provide several mentioned similarities to show how the events in the swing state do affect what is happening in the US as a whole. Thus, the argument is strong because of the similarities in the analogy. The unrest in North Carolina tends to be similar to what is happening in other states in the country. The weak argument is that Clinton needed to win in Michigan, Wisconsin Marco Reus Dortmund Jersey , and Pennsylvania states so as to win the presidency. The argument is weak because the swing states in the US tend not to be consistent in how they vote. Based on the presidential results this election, it clearly demonstrated that one cannot predict who will be the president based on the results of the previous election. The argument appears to be weak because of some dissimilarity in the analogy. When considering the election, the four states Florida, Michigan Marcel Schmelzer Dortmund Jersey , Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania that Trump won were all won by Obama in 2012 election. The Wisconsin had never voted for a Republican since 1984. Therefore, there making the claim that Clinton would end up being the president because Obama won in the three states in the previous election was a weak claim. The analogy does show the generalization of a result, which did prove to be opposite considering the results of the election where Trump won in the states despite Democrats leading in those states in the previous elections. In this aspect Marc Bartra Dortmund Jersey , I do consider this argument as being weak because it failed to provide similarity in how the three states do influence the results of the presidential election. It is possible for someone to disagree with my assessment of the weakness of the argument by claiming that the analogy of a win in the three states is based on the previous results in the swing states. They might claim that the swing state in the US tends to have a consistent voting pattern for either republicans or democrats.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at Melda Research in article critique writing services if you need a similar paper you can place your order for a custom research paper from customized term papers. More About the Author
Author is associated with which is a global Custom Essay Writing and Term Paper Writing Company. If you would like help in Research Papers and Term Paper Help you can visit Custom Writing Service
Total Views: 47Word Count: 580See All articles From Author Making the decision to open an account at a credit union can be one of the best financial choices a person makes. Distinctly different from corporate banking institutions, credit unions offer members advantages that larger institutions simply do not. . Unlike banks that may be publicly owned and traded, credit unions are nonprofit cooperatives that are owned by individual members. This distinction paves the way for advantages that traditional banks are often unable to compete with.
When it comes to placing their money, people have many choices. Credit unions make an exceptional option for these reasons and more:
鈥?Credit unions tend to be more personal 鈥?Big banks often have a very corporate feel Mahmoud Dahoud Dortmund Jersey , but credit unions deliver a more personalized approach for people to handle their finances. Since credit unions serve their communities, they tend to offer a small town feel. In a world where people often feel like just another number, this sense of familiarity can be quite refreshing. 鈥?Credit union members benefit from their credit union鈥檚 success 鈥?When big banks make big profits, the money goes to shareholders and into expensive advertising campaigns. When credit unions fare well Lukasz Piszczek Dortmund Jersey , the benefits are returned to members through lower fees and better interest rates and services. 鈥?Loan rates tend to be lower 鈥揅redit unions don鈥檛 have shareholders to please with big earnings reports. With that in mind, they are able to offer lower interest rates on credit cards and loans in many cases. This can add up to big savings for members over the long run. 鈥?Interest rates on savings accounts tend to be higher 鈥?When money is placed in a credit union, it tends to earn a higher interest rate than traditional bank customers might enjoy. This can add up to a long-term benefit for those who want to make their money work for them. 鈥?Peace of mind is assured 鈥?Credit union customers do enjoy the same level of security as traditional banking customers. While the Federal Deposit Insurance Company insures deposits up to $250,000 at traditional banks Julian Weigl Dortmund Jersey , the National Credit Union Administration offers the same peace of mind at credit unions.